🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect women from violence, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The final decision now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups described as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a move proposed by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked broad outcry both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority support, the president could potentially send back the legislation for additional review if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect comparable discussions in other member states